Github link added to the techyons

[saranyakathiravan-techyonsadharagarwal]

We want to ensure high quality of the packages. Make sure that you've checked the boxes below before sending a pull request.

• I have read the Contribution Guidelines
• I have read the Maintainers Note
• I have read the Quality Standards

Not every repository (project) will require every option, but most projects should. Check the Contribution Guidelines for details.

• The repo documentation has a pkg.go.dev link.
• The repo documentation has a coverage service link.
• The repo documentation has a goreportcard link.
• The repo has a version-numbered release and a go.mod file.
• The repo has a continuous integration process that automatically runs tests that must pass before new pull requests are merged.
• Continuous integration is used to attempt to catch issues prior to releasing this package to end-users.

Please provide some links to your package to ease the review

• forge link (github.com, gitlab.com, etc):
• pkg.go.dev:
• goreportcard.com:
• coverage service link (codecov, coveralls, etc.):

Pull Request content

• The package has been added to the list in alphabetical order.
• The package has an appropriate description with correct grammar.
• As far as I know, the package has not been listed here before.

Category quality

Note that new categories can be added only when there are 3 packages or more.

Packages added a long time ago might not meet the current guidelines anymore. It would be very helpful if you could check 3-5 packages above and below your submission to ensure that they also still meet the Quality Standards.

Please delete one of the following lines:

• The packages around my addition still meet the Quality Standards.
• I removed the following packages around my addition: (please give a short reason for each removal)

Thanks for your PR, you're awesome! 😎

[github-actions]

Automated Quality Checks (from CONTRIBUTING minimum standards)

• Repo link: missing
• pkg.go.dev: missing
• goreportcard: missing
• coverage: missing

These checks are a best-effort automation and do not replace human review.

[sentry]

Bug: The new "techyons" entry in README.md is not in alphabetical order and uses an em dash (—) instead of a hyphen (-), which will cause CI tests to fail.
_{Severity: CRITICAL}

Suggested Fix

Move the "techyons" entry before the "wellington" entry to maintain alphabetical order. Additionally, replace the em dash (—) with a hyphen (-) between the link and the description to match the project's required format.

Prompt for AI Agent

Review the code at the location below. A potential bug has been identified by an AI
agent.
Verify if this is a real issue. If it is, propose a fix; if not, explain why it's not
valid.

Location: README.md#L3473

Potential issue: The new "techyons" entry in `README.md` violates two project validation
rules, which will cause CI tests to fail. First, it is not in the correct alphabetical
position; it is placed after "wellington" when it should be before. This will be caught
by the `TestAlpha` test. Second, it uses an em dash (—) as a separator instead of the
required hyphen (-). This will cause the `TestSeparator` test to fail because its regex,
`reLinkWithDescription`, specifically expects a hyphen. Both issues need to be corrected
for the CI checks to pass.

_{Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.}